These types of studies employ a systematic method to analyze and synthesize the results of numerous studies. "Systematic" in this case means following a strict set of steps - as outlined by entities like PRISMA and the Institute of Medicine - so as to make the review more reproducible and less biased. Consistent, thorough documentation is also key. Reviews of this type are not meant to be conducted by an individual but rather a (small) team of researchers. Systematic reviews are widely used in the health sciences, often to find a generalized conclusion from multiple evidence-based studies.
A systematic method that uses statistics to analyze the data from numerous studies. The researchers combine the data from studies with similar data types and analyze them as a single, expanded dataset. Meta-analyses are a type of systematic review.
Definitions used from University Libraries - Reno, Nevada.
https://guides.library.unr.edu/kinesiology/systematic_reviews
Primary research articles report on a single study. In the health sciences, primary research articles generally describe the following aspects of the study:
Review articles are the most common type of secondary research article in the health sciences. A review article is a summary of previously published research on a topic. Authors who are writing a review article will search databases for previously completed research and summarize or synthesize those articles, as opposed to recruiting participants and performing a new research study.
Specific types of review articles include:
Review articles often report on the following:
Information found in Science Direct, PubMed, SPORTSDiscus, and other databases can help you determine whether the article you're looking at is primary or secondary.
Secondary research/review article abstract
Infographic created by Loras College Library and reused under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.